Comments on: US Patent: Linked List

By: Beebo

Beebo — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:30:08 +0000

That’s alright, I own the patent on for..next loops, integers, and… remarks.

By: TechKnow

TechKnow — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:10:17 +0000

I want to patent/copyright/trademark every single version of the Hello, World program in every programming language so that I can get a cut from every beginners book out there.

The new plan to profits… 1. wait for something to be invented. 2. patent it. 3. ??? 4. Profit.

By: Trans

Trans — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:17:44 +0000

I want to patent the Variable and charge $1,000/yr per use license fee. How rich do you think I’d be? ;-)

By: Fabrizio Giudici

Fabrizio Giudici — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:22:51 +0000

“It is clear that omitting prior art is an art in itself that some have perfected to a science.”

Agreed. Who knows whether that art is already patented?

By: raveman

raveman — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000

Great news :) so job interview’s question to implement Linked List is dead?

By: Deepak

Deepak — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:01:01 +0000

Hope this does not trigger patenting craze in programmer world.

By: Duke

Duke — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:49:59 +0000

I will patent the patent application process. Problem solved.

By: There is a patent on the linked list. « CodeHead in the desert

There is a patent on the linked list. « CodeHead in the desert — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:58:26 +0000

[...] is a patent on the linked list. As recently pointed out by Juixe, the US government has given a patent on the linked list to LSI Logic Corp who filed for the patent [...]

By: Zecc

Zecc — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:43:50 +0000

@antoinek WAY too much “prior art”

By: bse

bse — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:57:38 +0000

“It is clear that omitting prior art is an art in itself that some have perfected to a science.”

I’m gonna patent omitting prior art in patent applications.