<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and Yahoo JavaScript CDN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/</link>
	<description>Break Coders Block!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ashish</title>
		<link>http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/comment-page-1/#comment-56862</link>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/#comment-56862</guid>
		<description>You touched my thoughts on subject &quot;My question is, why don’t browsers come pre-installed with the commonly used versions of JavaScript libraries? &quot;. 
I was thinking same from past 6 months.. and thought of elaborate proposal, how this will work. Not just jscripts.. what about library of images and CSS frameworks. These days, you have 200+GB of hard drive available. If I need to put aside 2-3 GB for &quot;compressed&quot; jscripts, CSSs and PNGs images, how fast will be internet surfing. Now combine with mobile sites with limited bandwidth. It&#039;s win-win for developer, user and network provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You touched my thoughts on subject &#8220;My question is, why don’t browsers come pre-installed with the commonly used versions of JavaScript libraries? &#8220;.<br />
I was thinking same from past 6 months.. and thought of elaborate proposal, how this will work. Not just jscripts.. what about library of images and CSS frameworks. These days, you have 200+GB of hard drive available. If I need to put aside 2-3 GB for &#8220;compressed&#8221; jscripts, CSSs and PNGs images, how fast will be internet surfing. Now combine with mobile sites with limited bandwidth. It&#8217;s win-win for developer, user and network provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: machbio</title>
		<link>http://juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/comment-page-1/#comment-16411</link>
		<dc:creator>machbio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2009/05/12/google-and-yahoo-javascript-cdn/#comment-16411</guid>
		<description>great blog... &quot;Why dont Browser come with pre- installed scripts ?&quot;.. awesome thinking.. will post in browser discussions..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great blog&#8230; &#8220;Why dont Browser come with pre- installed scripts ?&#8221;.. awesome thinking.. will post in browser discussions..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

